My Representative in Congress sent me a disturbing email recently so I replied with the following. Enjoy.
—BEGIN EMAIL—
The message below has been held in our queue with status LOW PRIORITY. Your message will remain in this state for 48 hours after which it will be delivered via our spam relay. The reason for this status is given below:

UNPAID NEUTRALITY FEE

If you wish your message to be delivered immediately you may pay PROFITABLE ISP, CORP a priority handling fee of $10. This fee will cover all future emails for a period of ONE YEAR after which the fee will be automatically re-billed to your account.

NEW SERVICE OFFERING: Rush delivery! Beginning July 4th PROFITABLE ISP will hold all NEUTRAL-level member emails for 4 hours before delivery. If you wish your emails to be delivered immediately you can sign up for PRIORITY HANDLING which, for the low price of $100/year your email will be delivered immediately—just as if the Net was Neutral!

Make checks payable to PROFITABLE ISP, CORP.

NOW FOR A LIMITED TIME ONLY: Do you deliver emails regularly to PROFITABLE ISP customers but keep getting rejected by our spam filter? Sign up today for GUARANTEED DELIVERY service. For $2,000/year you can send all the spam you want to any or all of our customers. Contact our SPAM DESK. Customer email lists are also available at cheap rates!
—PROFITABLE ISP, CORP
“Scamming the public since Republicans decided Net Neutrality was a Democrat thing.”

On Thursday 14 February 2008 4:41:49 pm you wrote:
> Dear Daniel:
>
>
>
> Thank you for contacting me to express your opinion regarding “net
> neutrality”. I appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts
> with me on this matter.
>
>
>
> As you may be aware, Senator Byron Dorgan introduced S. 215
> on January 9, 2007 to regulate internet service providers and prevent
> them from prioritizing the traffic to some Web sites over others – > sometimes referred to as “net neutrality.” Freedom has been the hallmark
> of the Internet since its inception, and I believe this so called “net
> neutrality” threatens to destroy the very principles that have made the
> Internet so successful.
>
>
>
> The Internet has benefited greatly from the absence of regulatory
> restrictions. Beginning to implement restrictions now would have a
> detrimental impact. Americans are used to comparison shopping. From the
> cars we drive to the clothes we wear, consumers are accustomed to having
> the opportunity to shop around for the best deal and finding a product
> that best suits them. As we all know, healthy competition will continue
> to foster new services at affordable prices.
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, net neutrality would ultimately limit
> competition by instituting Federal regulations on how internet providers
> choose to supply their services. As this important issue continues to be
> debated here in Congress, rest assured that I will keep your views and
> thoughts in mind.
>
>
>
> Again, I want to thank you for taking the time to contact me. Please
> feel free to contact me if I can be of any further assistance on this
> matter or if you would like additional information on this topic or
> other issues facing Congress, please visit my Website at
> http://crenshaw.house.gov .
>