<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I wrote a poem today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riskable.com/2005/09/23/i-wrote-a-poem-today/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riskable.com/2005/09/23/i-wrote-a-poem-today</link>
	<description>Riskable's home on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Riskable</title>
		<link>http://riskable.com/2005/09/23/i-wrote-a-poem-today#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Riskable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 00:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riskable.com/2005/09/23/i-wrote-a-poem-today/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>1)  The 2004 Chevy Tahoe has 104.6 cubic feet of cargo space (with the seats folded down).  Hardly enough to hold your house.  Hell, you can't even get a couch in there!  It also gets 13MPG (EPA, realistically it gets about 10).  Considering that most gas stations in the area were completely sold out, you'd have to get out of town on the tank you had (highly unlikely).
2)  Heavier is meaningless.  When the winds are blowing 100+MPH, freight trucks are tossed around like toys.  Wind resistance counts more (lower to the ground the better).
3)  I wonder how many miles to the gallon it will get pulling a trailer?  3?

Just a reminder:  There's nothing stopping you from taking a two-wheel drive vehicle down the grass either.  It won't be good for the car, but it will work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1)  The 2004 Chevy Tahoe has 104.6 cubic feet of cargo space (with the seats folded down).  Hardly enough to hold your house.  Hell, you can&#8217;t even get a couch in there!  It also gets 13MPG (EPA, realistically it gets about 10).  Considering that most gas stations in the area were completely sold out, you&#8217;d have to get out of town on the tank you had (highly unlikely).<br />
2)  Heavier is meaningless.  When the winds are blowing 100+MPH, freight trucks are tossed around like toys.  Wind resistance counts more (lower to the ground the better).<br />
3)  I wonder how many miles to the gallon it will get pulling a trailer?  3?</p>
<p>Just a reminder:  There&#8217;s nothing stopping you from taking a two-wheel drive vehicle down the grass either.  It won&#8217;t be good for the car, but it will work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solid</title>
		<link>http://riskable.com/2005/09/23/i-wrote-a-poem-today#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>solid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riskable.com/2005/09/23/i-wrote-a-poem-today/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Everything you own represents some amount of work that you had to sacrifice in order to get.  For instance my, home represents 3 years of my gross salary (more since it is financed).  I'm not saying it is wise, but I'll be damned if I lose everything 

&#62; somehow owning a Chevy Tahoe would have been much more advantageous in a situation such as this
1) it has more interior storage space
2) it is heavier (more wind required to push it around)
3) it can pull a trailer with yer stuff on it
Just a reminder, 70 Miles Per Gallon doesn't help you if all the road in front of you is blocked by broken down vehicles.  Altho if you had 4Wheel Drive, you could probably rip off down the right side of the road where all the grass is.  But I don't think the prius of civic comes with 4wheel drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything you own represents some amount of work that you had to sacrifice in order to get.  For instance my, home represents 3 years of my gross salary (more since it is financed).  I&#8217;m not saying it is wise, but I&#8217;ll be damned if I lose everything </p>
<p>&gt; somehow owning a Chevy Tahoe would have been much more advantageous in a situation such as this<br />
1) it has more interior storage space<br />
2) it is heavier (more wind required to push it around)<br />
3) it can pull a trailer with yer stuff on it<br />
Just a reminder, 70 Miles Per Gallon doesn&#8217;t help you if all the road in front of you is blocked by broken down vehicles.  Altho if you had 4Wheel Drive, you could probably rip off down the right side of the road where all the grass is.  But I don&#8217;t think the prius of civic comes with 4wheel drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://riskable.com/2005/09/23/i-wrote-a-poem-today#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riskable.com/2005/09/23/i-wrote-a-poem-today/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;A) why did they not open the oncoming lanes for one way traffic of the people fleeing a possible disaster?&lt;/i&gt;

They did, actually...  but they took too long to do so (they Mayor of Houston was blaming the federal bureaucracy)

&lt;i&gt;B) how much of your personal belongings can you pack into a Chevy Tahoe versus a Honda civic or a Toyota Prius? Seems to me that if you are risking losing your home, there is no sense risking everything inside the home as well.&lt;/i&gt;

I can't accept the premise of this comment.  You're assuming that A) When trying to escape disaster, it is wise to fill your vehicle with as much of your "stuff" as possible and B) somehow owning a Chevy Tahoe would have been much more advantageous in a situation such as this.

Considering that the Chevy Tahoe drivers ran out of gas and Prius drivers didn't, it goes without saying that the Prius was a much more useful vehicle.

&lt;i&gt;BTW why is no one using the emergency lane? I would think that an impending natural disaster clearly constitutes an emergency.&lt;/i&gt;

They didn't let people use the breakdown lane because it was being used by emergency vehicles, tow trucks, and gasoline tankers.  If it was clogged with vehicles, they &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; would have gone nowhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>A) why did they not open the oncoming lanes for one way traffic of the people fleeing a possible disaster?</i></p>
<p>They did, actually&#8230;  but they took too long to do so (they Mayor of Houston was blaming the federal bureaucracy)</p>
<p><i>B) how much of your personal belongings can you pack into a Chevy Tahoe versus a Honda civic or a Toyota Prius? Seems to me that if you are risking losing your home, there is no sense risking everything inside the home as well.</i></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t accept the premise of this comment.  You&#8217;re assuming that A) When trying to escape disaster, it is wise to fill your vehicle with as much of your &#8220;stuff&#8221; as possible and B) somehow owning a Chevy Tahoe would have been much more advantageous in a situation such as this.</p>
<p>Considering that the Chevy Tahoe drivers ran out of gas and Prius drivers didn&#8217;t, it goes without saying that the Prius was a much more useful vehicle.</p>
<p><i>BTW why is no one using the emergency lane? I would think that an impending natural disaster clearly constitutes an emergency.</i></p>
<p>They didn&#8217;t let people use the breakdown lane because it was being used by emergency vehicles, tow trucks, and gasoline tankers.  If it was clogged with vehicles, they <i>really</i> would have gone nowhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solid</title>
		<link>http://riskable.com/2005/09/23/i-wrote-a-poem-today#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>solid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riskable.com/2005/09/23/i-wrote-a-poem-today/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I have 2 thoughts about this picture:
A) why did they not open the oncomming lanes for one way traffic of the people fleeing a possible disaster?
B) how much of your personal belongings can you pack into a Chevy Tahoe versus a Honda civic or a Toyota Prius?  Seems to me that if you are risking losing your home, there is no sense risking everything inside the home as well.  This picture to me says "Hey look how stupid Government is.  They are enforcing normal traffic laws in an absurdly abnormal situation."  Open the Other 3 lanes to evacuees!!!  BTW why is no one using the emergency lane?  I would think that a impending natural disaster clearly constitutes an emergency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 2 thoughts about this picture:<br />
A) why did they not open the oncomming lanes for one way traffic of the people fleeing a possible disaster?<br />
B) how much of your personal belongings can you pack into a Chevy Tahoe versus a Honda civic or a Toyota Prius?  Seems to me that if you are risking losing your home, there is no sense risking everything inside the home as well.  This picture to me says &#8220;Hey look how stupid Government is.  They are enforcing normal traffic laws in an absurdly abnormal situation.&#8221;  Open the Other 3 lanes to evacuees!!!  BTW why is no one using the emergency lane?  I would think that a impending natural disaster clearly constitutes an emergency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solid</title>
		<link>http://riskable.com/2005/09/23/i-wrote-a-poem-today#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>solid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riskable.com/2005/09/23/i-wrote-a-poem-today/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>maybe you should put this to music.  I'm sure it would be an instant cult favorite.  I can see Cindy Sheehan singing it while complaining some more about "Occupied New Orleans".  I think it should like a 60s motown style.  I'm thinking like the Temptations' style complete with backup singers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe you should put this to music.  I&#8217;m sure it would be an instant cult favorite.  I can see Cindy Sheehan singing it while complaining some more about &#8220;Occupied New Orleans&#8221;.  I think it should like a 60s motown style.  I&#8217;m thinking like the Temptations&#8217; style complete with backup singers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
